Artificial intelligence (“AI”) is advancing rapidly, transforming industries and societies. As a jurisdiction at the forefront of AI development, Singapore stands at the crossroads of this nascent but fast evolving sector, where the need for a thoughtful, robust regulatory framework is apparent. This article considers the risk based approach within Singapore’s regulatory landscape, exploring in detail the principle of accountability embedded therein. It goes on to posit the future direction of AI regulation and governance in Singapore, highlighting key considerations that must be taken into account in developing and refining any formal regulatory regime.
It was predicted that remote hearings would be conducted less frequently after the COVID-19 pandemic, because such hearings did not allow witnesses to be confronted face‑to‑face, were perceived to be informal and made it difficult to observe body signals of witnesses. This article discusses why these reasons are not tenable. Further, it highlights the case law and relevant provisions in the Courts (Civil and Criminal Justice) Reform Act 2021 (Act 25 of 2021) pertaining to remote hearings and recommends procedural reforms to increase the use of video conferencing technology, to enhance the administration of, and access to, justice.
New AI governance initiatives were introduced to enhance the safety of AI for Singaporeans and global citizens at the recent AI Action Summit which was held in February. This update highlights the key features of these initiatives.
This update sets out the three new initiatives that were announced by Minister for Digital Development and Information Josephine Teo during the AI Action Summit which was held in Paris from 10 to 11 February 2025.
Chinese national Li Ming was offered bail of $1 million while Singaporeans Alan Wei Zhaolun and Aaron Woon Guo Jie were offered bail of $800,000 and $600,000, respectively.
MHA said Facebook was unable to curb the frequency of scam advertisements in the second half of 2024.
The Online Safety Commission and upcoming Bill aims to speed up the time taken for victims to get help for online harms encountered online.
The legal profession is undergoing a transformative shift with generative artificial intelligence (“AI”). Integrated into legal technology, it now enhances legal tasks like contract drafting and analysis. Generative AI boosts productivity by processing vast data and providing real-time insights. Case studies show significant time reductions, though human oversight is vital for accuracy. As AI becomes more common, lawyers must be trained not only in legal principles but also in the nuances of AI and prompt engineering, ensuring a future where technology and human expertise seamlessly integrate to enhance legal services. As William Gibson observed: “The future is already here – it’s just not evenly distributed”.
These harms include online harassment, intimate image abuse, child abuse material, impersonation, deepfakes and hate speech.
2 accused of defrauding US supplier; third man charged under Computer Misuse Act.
While cyberattacks relying on technological advances become increasingly common, the weakest point of any system often remains the well-intentioned but occasionally unintentionally bumbling human actors. This article looks at a venerable attack in any threat actor’s toolkit – the man-in-the-middle attack – and the legal implications arising therefrom.
Cyberbullying and doxing are two forms of online abuse the Government is concerned about.
Minister of State for Law Murali Pillai said the ministry is focused on the impact of technology in the legal sector.
A review panel flagged shortcomings that led to the mass disclosure of NRIC numbers of key business representatives and others on Bizfile’s database.
They say they do not use fear-based tactics or misleading claims in their advertisements.
Parts of the guidelines are likely to be incorporated into the upcoming Digital Infrastructure Act.
This article provides a summary of the key elements of the Gen AI Guide 2025 which establishes common principles and recommends best practices on the implementation of trustworthy AI in ASEAN.
Singapore and Australia have signed a new memorandum of understanding reaffirming their commitment to facilitate AI adoption among their citizens and businesses, and promote responsible AI development and development on 16 December 2024.
This update highlights the Government’s current position on the use and disclosure of NRIC numbers based on existing statements and guidelines.
This is a sampling of some decisions that the Singapore courts handed down in 2024, which provide useful insights relating to intellectual property, intangible assets or technology.