"Engaging, informative, educational and established speakers!" Rated 4-5 stars on MySkillsFuture. Take advantage of the early bird special and SSG funding.

Climate disputes – which form a distinct and increasingly important category of disputes – have particular needs and give rise to particular challenges. Traditional adversarial models of adjudication will often not be best suited to providing the most suitable or meaningful resolution of these disputes, or to addressing the real problems that underlie them. This article suggests that a bespoke model of justice – informed by the concept of therapeutic justice – should be developed for climate disputes, to ensure that they are managed and resolved in a way that meaningfully addresses the wider interests and the deeper issues at stake. Such a model should be restorative, holistic, interest-based and forward-looking, and would mark a shift from a singular focus on the adjudication of rights and wrongs to the facilitated resolution of conflict.

"Engaging, informative, educational and established speakers!" Rated 4-5 stars on MySkillsFuture. Take advantage of the early bird special and SSG funding.

The Singapore High Court in DMZ v DNA [2025] SGHC 31 held that proceedings commenced by the claimant seeking review of an administrative decision made by the Singapore International Arbitration Centre were bound to fail. The decision is worthy of note as a rare instance of judicial authority considering the relationship between arbitral institutions and the parties to the arbitrations they administer, as well as the supervisory court's role in overseeing institutional arbitrations.

"Engaging, informative, educational and established speakers!" Rated 4-5 stars on MySkillsFuture. Take advantage of the early bird special and SSG funding.